HostFOLD vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
FOLD (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
FOLD vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-08-31 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| FOLD | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.09333 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $2.18M | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.99M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 52 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~998× the liquidity of FOLD
- CRD measures ~1,850× the 24h volume of FOLD
What the data says
FOLD
Interfold (FOLD) is a small-cap token in the MEV-infrastructure family — the lineage runs back through Manifold Finance, a team that built validator-facing orderflow tooling on Ethereum. The contract 0xe172e9b6cfbeeb5593bdce3f077356fdb33af904 is the deployment our scan tracks; the August 31, 2026 read shows $2.0 million of pool liquidity.
The honest framing at this size: the thesis is niche infrastructure exposure, the float is thin, and the difference between a real market and a wide spread can be a single wallet. Small-issuer rules apply in full — verify the team's current product surface before assuming the token accrues anything.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FOLD or CRD?
By tracked market cap: FOLD (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FOLD or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: FOLD (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FOLD and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show FOLD at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
FOLD vs RYYFOLD vs FKBFOLD vs RDKFOLD vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.