HostFLING vs WAMONUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
FLING (Monad) vs WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
FLING vs WAMONUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| FLING | WAMONUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001548 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $81.42K | $697.49K |
| Liquidity | $27.00K | $1.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 4 | 42 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~41× the liquidity of FLING
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~8.6× the 24h volume of FLING
What the data says
FLING
FLING is an early-stage token on Monad — the new high-throughput EVM chain whose token economy is still young. The contract 0xa9da3c77ec7cdc4dfaa1fe142af583543d1c540f is what our scan tracks: $27 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 15, 2026.
The honest frame for early Monad tokens generally: the chain itself is new, so every asset on it is early-stage by definition — thin pools, fast narratives, and a market that has not sorted winners from launch-week noise yet. Twenty-seven thousand dollars of liquidity is the practical fact: size any position against the pool, not the storyline.
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
FAQ
Which is bigger, FLING or WAMONUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: FLING (Monad) measures — and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, FLING or WAMONUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: FLING (Monad) grades B and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have FLING and WAMONUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show FLING at 0.00% and WAMONUSDT0 at +0.13%.
More comparisons
FLING vs RYYFLING vs FKBFLING vs CRDFLING vs RDKWAMONUSDT0 vs RYYWAMONUSDT0 vs FKBWAMONUSDT0 vs CRDWAMONUSDT0 vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.