HostWAMONUSDT0 vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WAMONUSDT0 vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WAMONUSDT0 | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $697.49K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $1.11M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 42 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~1,785× the liquidity of WAMONUSDT0
- CRD measures ~5,775× the 24h volume of WAMONUSDT0
What the data says
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WAMONUSDT0 or CRD?
By tracked market cap: WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WAMONUSDT0 or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WAMONUSDT0 and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WAMONUSDT0 at +0.13% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WAMONUSDT0 vs RYYWAMONUSDT0 vs FKBWAMONUSDT0 vs RDKWAMONUSDT0 vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.