HostBMT vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
BMT (Solana) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
BMT vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| BMT | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01845 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | $8.73M | — |
| 24h volume | $34.68K | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $126.60K | $2.26B |
| FDV | $8.73M | — |
| Holders | 5,944 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~17,826× the liquidity of BMT
- RYY measures ~100,239× the 24h volume of BMT
What the data says
BMT
BMT is the token of Bubblemaps — the on-chain visualization tool that maps wallet clusters and supply concentration, a genuinely used piece of crypto analytics. The mint FQgtfugBdpFN7PZ6NdPrZpVLDBrPGxXesi4gVu3vErhY is what our scan tracks: $8.7 million market cap, $127 thousand of liquidity and 5,944 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: Bubblemaps is one of the few tokens here whose product you have probably already used — wallet-cluster maps are embedded across crypto tooling. The token's value case ties to monetizing that product surface, which is still developing, so this trades as an analytics-platform bet with a mid-cap liquidity profile to match.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BMT or RYY?
By tracked market cap: BMT (Solana) measures $8.73M and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BMT or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: BMT (Solana) grades A and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BMT and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show BMT at +2.10% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BMT vs FKBBMT vs CRDBMT vs RDKBMT vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.