HostBMT vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
BMT (Solana) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
BMT vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| BMT | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.01845 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | $8.73M | — |
| 24h volume | $34.68K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $126.60K | $1.74B |
| FDV | $8.73M | — |
| Holders | 5,944 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~13,766× the liquidity of BMT
- RDK measures ~83,234× the 24h volume of BMT
What the data says
BMT
BMT is the token of Bubblemaps — the on-chain visualization tool that maps wallet clusters and supply concentration, a genuinely used piece of crypto analytics. The mint FQgtfugBdpFN7PZ6NdPrZpVLDBrPGxXesi4gVu3vErhY is what our scan tracks: $8.7 million market cap, $127 thousand of liquidity and 5,944 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The honest read: Bubblemaps is one of the few tokens here whose product you have probably already used — wallet-cluster maps are embedded across crypto tooling. The token's value case ties to monetizing that product surface, which is still developing, so this trades as an analytics-platform bet with a mid-cap liquidity profile to match.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BMT or RDK?
By tracked market cap: BMT (Solana) measures $8.73M and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BMT or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: BMT (Solana) grades A and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BMT and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show BMT at +2.10% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
BMT vs RYYBMT vs FKBBMT vs CRDBMT vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.