HostBLBAUSD vs WAMONUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
BLBAUSD (Monad) vs WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
BLBAUSD vs WAMONUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| BLBAUSD | WAMONUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.01 | $1.00 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $82.48K | $697.49K |
| Liquidity | $34.10K | $1.11M |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 8 | 42 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~33× the liquidity of BLBAUSD
- WAMONUSDT0 measures ~8.5× the 24h volume of BLBAUSD
What the data says
BLBAUSD
BLBAUSD is Blueberry's AUSD receipt token on Monad — the position token of a lending-market deposit in Blueberry Protocol, denominated in AUSD. The contract 0xc2ddc1004ca0d6cc4bfd1dcd03dcf855bed8e670 is what our scan tracks: $34 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 16, 2026, priced essentially at a dollar.
Receipt tokens deserve their own read: the dollar price is accounting, not a stablecoin peg — what backs it is a claim on a lending pool inside Blueberry, so the risk stack is protocol solvency plus the AUSD backing beneath it. Pool liquidity on receipts like this is thin by design (most holders hold, not trade) — redemptions at size go through the protocol, not the market.
WAMONUSDT0
WAMONUSDT0 is Aave's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the interest-bearing receipt for USDT0 supplied into Aave's Monad market, where USDT0 is Tether's omnichain dollar built on LayerZero rails. The deployment 0x5e7109a755fd2b86361f95065cde07fbab50ca1d is the receipt contract; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.1 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics stack two layers: the holder owns a claim on USDT0 in Aave (lending yield plus Aave's solvency assumptions) and USDT0 is itself a claim on Tether's reserve routed through LayerZero's bridge — three hops from dollars in a bank. On a new chain, wrapped-receipt depth this early is the chain's money-market actually forming.
FAQ
Which is bigger, BLBAUSD or WAMONUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: BLBAUSD (Monad) measures — and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, BLBAUSD or WAMONUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: BLBAUSD (Monad) grades B and WAMONUSDT0 (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have BLBAUSD and WAMONUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show BLBAUSD at +0.15% and WAMONUSDT0 at +0.13%.
More comparisons
BLBAUSD vs RYYBLBAUSD vs FKBBLBAUSD vs CRDBLBAUSD vs RDKWAMONUSDT0 vs RYYWAMONUSDT0 vs FKBWAMONUSDT0 vs CRDWAMONUSDT0 vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.