HostARB vs SLIM — price, size and safety, side by side
ARB (Arbitrum) vs SLIM (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17.
ARB vs SLIM — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| ARB | SLIM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1558 | $0.004136 |
| Market cap | — | $395.04K |
| 24h volume | $16.57M | $149.60 |
| Liquidity | $1.52M | $167.46K |
| FDV | — | $395.04K |
| Holders | — | 405,877 |
| Age (days) | 1,279 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- ARB measures ~9.1× the liquidity of SLIM
- ARB measures ~110,795× the 24h volume of SLIM
- over the shared window ARB moved +8.46% while SLIM moved −13.7%
What the data says
ARB
ARB is Arbitrum's own token — the governance asset of the largest Ethereum L2, the chain most of this index's Arbitrum-side liquidity actually lives on. The deployment 0x912ce59144191c1204e64559fe8253a0e49e6548 is the canonical mint; our September 16, 2026 snapshot reads $1.5 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest asymmetry: ARB's market value rides on the chain it governs being worth governing — the token's thesis is Arbitrum's sequencer revenue, its DAO treasury, and the chain's continued dominance in L2 DeFi, none of which a liquidity snapshot can confirm or deny. What the snapshot does show is that ARB's on-chain depth is concentrated and modest relative to the chain's own TVL — most ARB trades happen off-chain or on the chain's own DEX infrastructure in pairs this index doesn't fully see.
SLIM
SLIM is a fossil from Solana's first mania, still breathing. Solanium was one of 2021's hot IDO launchpads — the venues that sold allocations in new projects to token-holding members — and SLIM, at mint xxxxa1sKNGwFtw2kFn8XauW9xq8hBZ5kVtcSesTT9fW, was the key that unlocked participation tiers. The launchpad era faded; the holder base it minted did not. As of HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot: 405,877 wallets still hold SLIM, against a market capitalization of roughly $395 thousand. Read that pair again — nearly half a million holders, less than half a million dollars of total value. The average position is worth about a dollar.
Structurally, there's nothing wrong with it, which is its own kind of interesting: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, about $167 thousand of pool liquidity that is actually large relative to the microscopic mcap. Nobody can inflate it, nobody can freeze you, and the exits — for positions this small — clear fine. The checks a scam fails, SLIM passes; it simply also demonstrates that passing them guarantees nothing about value.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ARB or SLIM?
By tracked market cap: ARB (Arbitrum) measures — and SLIM (Solana) measures $395.04K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ARB or SLIM?
On the contract checks we publish: ARB (Arbitrum) grades B and SLIM (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ARB and SLIM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show ARB at +8.46% and SLIM at −13.7%.
More comparisons
ARB vs RYYARB vs FKBARB vs CRDARB vs RDKSLIM vs RYYSLIM vs FKBSLIM vs CRDSLIM vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.