HostAPXUSD vs ZAMA — price, size and safety, side by side
APXUSD (Solana) vs ZAMA (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
APXUSD vs ZAMA — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| APXUSD | ZAMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9753 | $0.04771 |
| Market cap | $5.13M | — |
| 24h volume | $103.94K | $812.02K |
| Liquidity | $568.77K | $501.74K |
| FDV | $5.13M | — |
| Holders | 82 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 224 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~7.8× the 24h volume of APXUSD
What the data says
APXUSD
apxUSD is a yield-bearing synthetic dollar associated with the APX/Aster perpetuals ecosystem — a dollar token whose backing is a trading strategy rather than a bank account. On Solana it sits at mint HAYQtfJEQ9DbDbaHEhxfGsWbSZ3ywthdsVB3PuB72DYe; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $569 thousand of tracked pool liquidity against a market capitalization near $5 million — and only about 82 holders, an unusually concentrated base for a token this size.
That holder count is the detail worth sitting with. A stablecoin with tens of millions in implied value but dozens of Solana-side holders is a token whose presence here is mostly a bridge deposit, not a user base — the vast majority of apxUSD lives on its home venue (BNB Chain, where Aster's perps business runs). The Solana representation is a claim on a claim: an issuer-managed synthetic dollar on one end, a bridge custody on the other, and this pool in the middle.
ZAMA
ZAMA is the token of Zama — the cryptography company building fully homomorphic encryption tooling for blockchains, one of the few serious attempts at confidential on-chain computation. The contract 0xa12cc123ba206d4031d1c7f6223d1c2ec249f4f3 is what our scan tracks: $502 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 14, 2026.
The honest read: this is an infrastructure bet on a hard problem — FHE has been "almost practical" for years, and Zama is among the credible teams actually shipping it — but the token's value depends on whether confidential-compute demand materializes on-chain at the scale the pitch implies. Real team, real tech, early-stage adoption risk.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APXUSD or ZAMA?
By tracked market cap: APXUSD (Solana) measures $5.13M and ZAMA (Ethereum) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APXUSD or ZAMA?
On the contract checks we publish: APXUSD (Solana) grades A and ZAMA (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APXUSD and ZAMA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show APXUSD at +1.16% and ZAMA at 0.00%.
More comparisons
APXUSD vs RYYAPXUSD vs FKBAPXUSD vs CRDAPXUSD vs RDKZAMA vs RYYZAMA vs FKBZAMA vs CRDZAMA vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.