HostAPXUSD vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
APXUSD (Solana) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
APXUSD vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| APXUSD | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9753 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | $5.13M | — |
| 24h volume | $103.94K | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $568.77K | $2.19B |
| FDV | $5.13M | — |
| Holders | 82 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~3,843× the liquidity of APXUSD
- FKB measures ~23,534× the 24h volume of APXUSD
What the data says
APXUSD
apxUSD is a yield-bearing synthetic dollar associated with the APX/Aster perpetuals ecosystem — a dollar token whose backing is a trading strategy rather than a bank account. On Solana it sits at mint HAYQtfJEQ9DbDbaHEhxfGsWbSZ3ywthdsVB3PuB72DYe; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $569 thousand of tracked pool liquidity against a market capitalization near $5 million — and only about 82 holders, an unusually concentrated base for a token this size.
That holder count is the detail worth sitting with. A stablecoin with tens of millions in implied value but dozens of Solana-side holders is a token whose presence here is mostly a bridge deposit, not a user base — the vast majority of apxUSD lives on its home venue (BNB Chain, where Aster's perps business runs). The Solana representation is a claim on a claim: an issuer-managed synthetic dollar on one end, a bridge custody on the other, and this pool in the middle.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, APXUSD or FKB?
By tracked market cap: APXUSD (Solana) measures $5.13M and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, APXUSD or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: APXUSD (Solana) grades A and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have APXUSD and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show APXUSD at +1.16% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
APXUSD vs RYYAPXUSD vs CRDAPXUSD vs RDKAPXUSD vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.