Host01 vs RDK — price, size and safety, side by side
01 (Ethereum) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
01 vs RDK — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| 01 | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6371 | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $817.23K | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $2.09M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 61 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RDK measures ~832× the liquidity of 01
- RDK measures ~3,532× the 24h volume of 01
What the data says
01
There's a small gap on this page — 01's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-08-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, 01 shows deep liquidity of $2.09M and a young 61-day history as of 2026-08-09. Read $2.09M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling.
RDK
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 01 or RDK?
By tracked market cap: 01 (Ethereum) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 01 or RDK?
On the contract checks we publish: 01 (Ethereum) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 01 and RDK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show 01 at 0.00% and RDK at 0.00%.
More comparisons
01 vs RYY01 vs FKB01 vs CRD01 vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.