Host01 vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
01 (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T23:42:29 / 2026-09-17T23:42:29.
01 vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-15T19:06:11 to 2026-09-17T23:42:29
| 01 | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6371 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $817.23K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $2.09M | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 61 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~948× the liquidity of 01
- CRD measures ~4,929× the 24h volume of 01
What the data says
01
There's a small gap on this page — 01's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-08-09. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the trading data, 01 shows deep liquidity of $2.09M and a young 61-day history as of 2026-08-09. Read $2.09M of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, 01 or CRD?
By tracked market cap: 01 (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, 01 or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: 01 (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have 01 and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15T19:06:11 and 2026-09-17T23:42:29, the measured snapshots show 01 at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
01 vs RYY01 vs FKB01 vs RDK01 vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15T19:06:11→2026-09-17T23:42:29; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.