HostZC vs FUSE — price, size and safety, side by side
ZC (Ethereum) vs FUSE (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
ZC vs FUSE — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ZC | FUSE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002615 | $0.000558 |
| Market cap | $17.94M | $2.02M |
| 24h volume | $4.04M DEX | $1.55M DEX |
| Liquidity | $326.97K | $326.08K |
| FDV | $18.08M | $2.02M |
| Holders | 5,596 | 1,626 |
| Age (days) | 6 | 4 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZC measures ~8.9× the market cap of FUSE
- ZC measures ~2.6× the 24h volume of FUSE
- ZC measures ~3.4× the holder count of FUSE
- over the shared window ZC moved −86.7% while FUSE moved −62.4%
What the data says
ZC
There's a lot to like about how ZC's contract is set up. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and the contract can't pause or block transfers, leaving you free to trade on your own terms. Neither lever existing is the main reason ZC's 90/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-10-09).
By the numbers, ZC is showing workable liquidity of $326.97K, 5,596 holders and a brand-new record at 6 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $17.94M, the $326.97K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 5,596-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just 0.73% of ZC as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FUSE
FUSE is the token of Fuse Network — a payments-focused EVM chain that has been building merchant and stablecoin-payment tooling since before "payments chain" was a trend. The contract 0x126f5ece91d971f8ad62fa4fc1054456b8bd1111 is what our scan tracks: $326 thousand of pool liquidity as of October 6, 2026.
The honest read: Fuse is a long-running niche chain in the most contested lane in crypto — payments — competing against both crypto-native stablecoin rails and the incumbent card networks everyone claims to disrupt. The token is a bet on its specific merchant footprint compounding, and the modest pool means that bet is sized at small-cap terms.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZC or FUSE?
By tracked market cap: ZC (Ethereum) measures $17.94M and FUSE (Ethereum) measures $2.02M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZC or FUSE?
On the contract checks we publish: ZC (Ethereum) grades A and FUSE (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZC and FUSE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ZC at −86.7% and FUSE at −62.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.