HostZAUTH vs GNON — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAUTH (Solana) vs GNON (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
ZAUTH vs GNON — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| ZAUTH | GNON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00138 | $0.0001416 |
| Market cap | $1.25M | $136.72K |
| 24h volume | $16.68K | $29 |
| Liquidity | $67.13K | $67.31K |
| FDV | $1.25M | $136.72K |
| Holders | 2,384 | 20,222 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAUTH measures ~9.2× the market cap of GNON
- ZAUTH measures ~575× the 24h volume of GNON
- GNON measures ~8.5× the holder count of ZAUTH
- over the shared window ZAUTH moved −15.7% while GNON moved −4.60%
What the data says
ZAUTH
zauthx402 — ZAUTH — an x402-sector token (the agent-payments protocol wave: HTTP-native micropayments for machine clients) on Solana at mint DNhQZ1CE9qZ2FNrVhsCXwQJ2vZG8ufZkcYakTS5Jpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $67 thousand of liquidity and roughly 2,384 holders.
The x402 narrative is real — machine-to-machine payments is a genuine emerging category — and sector tokens on it are thesis-priced: the bet is that this project's rails get used, not that current volume proves it. The honest scan-can't-answer question is whether agent traffic actually flows through it.
GNON
numogram — GNON — the token attached to an AI-concept project (the "Lumpen Space" / GNON agent-research persona that briefly became the agent-sector's philosophical mascot) — on Solana at mint HeJUFDxfJSzYFUuHLxkMqCgytU31G6mjP4wKviwqpump. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $67 thousand of liquidity and roughly 20,222 holders.
GNON had a genuinely unusual moment — it ran to a massive valuation on the strength of an AI persona and an "agent economy" narrative, and then its own originator publicly detached from it, which is the cleanest possible illustration of persona-token risk: the asset's value was the association, and the association left.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAUTH or GNON?
By tracked market cap: ZAUTH (Solana) measures $1.25M and GNON (Solana) measures $136.72K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAUTH or GNON?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAUTH (Solana) grades A and GNON (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAUTH and GNON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show ZAUTH at −15.7% and GNON at −4.60%.
More comparisons
ZAUTH vs RYYZAUTH vs FKBZAUTH vs CRDZAUTH vs RDKGNON vs RYYGNON vs FKBGNON vs CRDGNON vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.