HostYES vs AXLUSDC — price, size and safety, side by side
YES (Blast) vs AXLUSDC (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
YES vs AXLUSDC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| YES | AXLUSDC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.17 | $0.9983 |
| Market cap | $46.93M | — |
| 24h volume | $298.46 DEX | $42.86K DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.72M | $124.62K |
| FDV | $155.72M | $130.38K |
| Holders | 7,406 | 2,524 |
| Age (days) | 950 | 943 |
| Safety grade | B | D |
Where they differ
- YES measures ~38× the liquidity of AXLUSDC
- AXLUSDC measures ~144× the 24h volume of YES
- YES measures ~2.9× the holder count of AXLUSDC
What the data says
YES
One detail on YES didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, YES shows deep liquidity of $4.72M, a holder base of 7,406 and an established record at 950 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.72M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $46.93M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 7,406-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
AXLUSDC
AXLUSDC has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now AXLUSDC's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, AXLUSDC stays around 47/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
Here's where AXLUSDC stands today: $124.62K of on-chain liquidity, 2,524 wallets holding and an established 943-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $124.62K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 2,524 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, YES or AXLUSDC?
By tracked market cap: YES (Blast) measures $46.93M and AXLUSDC (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, YES or AXLUSDC?
On the contract checks we publish: YES (Blast) grades B and AXLUSDC (Blast) grades D. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have YES and AXLUSDC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show YES at −2.16% and AXLUSDC at +0.83%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.