HostYEET vs OHM — price, size and safety, side by side
YEET (Berachain) vs OHM (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
YEET vs OHM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| YEET | OHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003095 | $19 |
| Market cap | $27.65K | $284.11M |
| 24h volume | $35.56 DEX | $19.57 DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.54K | $598.54 |
| FDV | $33.13K | $1.34M |
| Holders | 20,240 | 6,902 |
| Age (days) | 606 | 605 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- OHM measures ~10,274× the market cap of YEET
- YEET measures ~7.6× the liquidity of OHM
- YEET measures ~1.8× the 24h volume of OHM
- YEET measures ~2.9× the holder count of OHM
- over the shared window YEET moved −21.5% while OHM moved +0.04%
What the data says
YEET
YEET's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why YEET earns a A (85/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, YEET brings $4.54K of on-chain liquidity, 20,240 wallets holding and 606 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.54K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $27.65K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 20,240-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created YEET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
OHM
OHM has one open item that shapes the whole read, so let's start there. Right now OHM's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Until that changes, OHM stays around 60/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
On liquidity and holders, OHM shows thin liquidity of $599, 6,902 holders and an established record at 605 days as of 2026-10-09. Set the $599 pool against roughly $284.11M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. The 6,902-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHM as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, YEET or OHM?
By tracked market cap: YEET (Berachain) measures $27.65K and OHM (Berachain) measures $284.11M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, YEET or OHM?
On the contract checks we publish: YEET (Berachain) grades A and OHM (Berachain) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have YEET and OHM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show YEET at −21.5% and OHM at +0.04%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.