HostXLM vs ATOM — price, size and safety, side by side
XLM (Cronos) vs ATOM (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
XLM vs ATOM — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| XLM | ATOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1804 | $1.76 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $4.12K DEX | $23.65K DEX |
| Liquidity | $62.40K | $57.72K |
| FDV | $1.38M | $810.62K |
| Holders | 4,134 | 12,051 |
| Age (days) | 1,677 | 1,757 |
| Safety grade | E | E |
Where they differ
- ATOM measures ~5.7× the 24h volume of XLM
- ATOM measures ~2.9× the holder count of XLM
What the data says
XLM
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on XLM. As of 2026-10-09, XLM's contract still holds a mint and freeze levers, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why XLM is at E (21/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, XLM carries workable liquidity of $62.40K, 4,134 holders and an established record at 1,677 days as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $62.40K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 4,134-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created XLM holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
ATOM
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on ATOM to flag. The mint and freeze levers on ATOM's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which means the team can still create new supply or freeze transfers. Until that changes, ATOM stays around 21/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, ATOM is showing a $57.72K pool, 12,051 holders and an established record at 1,757 days as of 2026-10-09. Treat $57.72K as the room your trade has to work in — the smaller the pool relative to your size, the more your own order moves the price. 12,051 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created ATOM holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XLM or ATOM?
By tracked market cap: XLM (Cronos) measures — and ATOM (Cronos) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XLM or ATOM?
On the contract checks we publish: XLM (Cronos) grades E and ATOM (Cronos) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XLM and ATOM performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show XLM at −6.28% and ATOM at −10.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.