HostXAUT vs APXUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
XAUT (Ethereum) vs APXUSD (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
XAUT vs APXUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| XAUT | APXUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $4.15K | $0.9859 |
| Market cap | $3.39B | $314.83M |
| 24h volume | $3.92M DEX | $2.45M DEX |
| Liquidity | $13.84M | $12.85M |
| FDV | $3.47B | $296.86M |
| Holders | — | 1,868 |
| Age (days) | 376 | 71 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- XAUT measures ~11× the market cap of APXUSD
- XAUT measures ~1.6× the 24h volume of APXUSD
What the data says
XAUT
There's a small gap on this page — XAUT's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the trading data, XAUT shows $13.84M of on-chain liquidity and an established 376-day history as of 2026-10-09. Set the $13.84M pool against roughly $3.39B in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care.
APXUSD
apxUSD on Ethereum — the synthetic, yield-bearing dollar associated with the APX/Aster perpetuals ecosystem — at contract 0x98a878b1cd98131b271883b390f68d2c90674665. The October 9, 2026 snapshot records about $12.9 million of tracked Ethereum-side liquidity.
Two structures to understand here. First the instrument: apxUSD is not a fiat-backed stablecoin — its backing is a trading strategy (funding-rate/basis exposure run by the issuer), which means the peg's reliability is a function of strategy performance rather than redeemable reserves. Second the venue: apxUSD's home is BNB Chain where Aster's perp business runs; the Ethereum deployment is a secondary venue, and the liquidity on this chain is what you actually trade against.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XAUT or APXUSD?
By tracked market cap: XAUT (Ethereum) measures $3.39B and APXUSD (Ethereum) measures $314.83M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XAUT or APXUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: XAUT (Ethereum) grades B and APXUSD (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XAUT and APXUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show XAUT at +0.02% and APXUSD at +0.58%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.