HostWXDAI vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
WXDAI (Gnosis) vs WBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WXDAI vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WXDAI | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998 | $81.15K |
| Market cap | $44.66M | $9.63B |
| 24h volume | $403.87K DEX | $185.99M DEX |
| Liquidity | $852.73K | $220.70M |
| FDV | $44.58M | $9.63B |
| Holders | 46,329 | 197,266 |
| Age (days) | 564 | 1,583 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~216× the market cap of WXDAI
- WBTC measures ~259× the liquidity of WXDAI
- WBTC measures ~461× the 24h volume of WXDAI
- WBTC measures ~4.3× the holder count of WXDAI
What the data says
WXDAI
WXDAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why WXDAI earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On liquidity and holders, WXDAI shows workable liquidity of $852.73K, a holder base of 46,329 and 564 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $44.66M, the $852.73K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 46,329-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created WXDAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WXDAI or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: WXDAI (Gnosis) measures $44.66M and WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WXDAI or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: WXDAI (Gnosis) grades A and WBTC (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WXDAI and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WXDAI at +0.05% and WBTC at −2.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.