HostWXDAI vs COW — price, size and safety, side by side
WXDAI (Gnosis) vs COW (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WXDAI vs COW — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WXDAI | COW | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.998 | $0.1329 |
| Market cap | $44.66M | $82.07M |
| 24h volume | $403.87K DEX | $7.47K DEX |
| Liquidity | $852.73K | $142.24K |
| FDV | $44.58M | $2.61M |
| Holders | 46,329 | 12,011 |
| Age (days) | 564 | 224 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- COW measures ~1.8× the market cap of WXDAI
- WXDAI measures ~6.0× the liquidity of COW
- WXDAI measures ~54× the 24h volume of COW
- WXDAI measures ~3.9× the holder count of COW
- over the shared window WXDAI moved +0.05% while COW moved −6.97%
What the data says
WXDAI
WXDAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't stop a sale either, so selling is always your call. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why WXDAI earns a A (100/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On liquidity and holders, WXDAI shows workable liquidity of $852.73K, a holder base of 46,329 and 564 days old as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $44.66M, the $852.73K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 46,329-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created WXDAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
COW
One detail on COW didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
By the numbers, COW is showing a $142.24K pool, a holder base of 12,011 and a maturing 224-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $142.24K of depth against a market cap of about $82.07M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: COW reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. A 12,011-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of COW as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WXDAI or COW?
By tracked market cap: WXDAI (Gnosis) measures $44.66M and COW (Gnosis) measures $82.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WXDAI or COW?
On the contract checks we publish: WXDAI (Gnosis) grades A and COW (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WXDAI and COW performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WXDAI at +0.05% and COW at −6.97%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.