HostWRSETH vs FWUSDB — price, size and safety, side by side
WRSETH (Blast) vs FWUSDB (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WRSETH vs FWUSDB — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WRSETH | FWUSDB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.36K | $0.9842 |
| Market cap | $31.92M | — |
| 24h volume | $24.66 DEX | $1.24K DEX |
| Liquidity | $35.36K | $34.13K |
| FDV | $88.36K | $14.72M |
| Holders | — | 5,191 |
| Age (days) | 927 | 954 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- FWUSDB measures ~50× the 24h volume of WRSETH
What the data says
WRSETH
One detail on WRSETH didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On the market side, WRSETH brings $35.36K of on-chain liquidity and an established 927-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $35.36K of depth against a market cap of about $31.92M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: WRSETH reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip.
FWUSDB
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on FWUSDB. The mint function on FWUSDB's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which means the team can still create new supply. Until that changes, FWUSDB stays around 34/100 — worth watching, and an easy win for the project if they remove it.
By the numbers, FWUSDB is showing $34.13K of on-chain liquidity, 5,191 holders and an established 954-day history as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $34.13K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. 5,191 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of FWUSDB as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WRSETH or FWUSDB?
By tracked market cap: WRSETH (Blast) measures $31.92M and FWUSDB (Blast) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WRSETH or FWUSDB?
On the contract checks we publish: WRSETH (Blast) grades B and FWUSDB (Blast) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WRSETH and FWUSDB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WRSETH at −4.90% and FWUSDB at −0.97%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.