HostWOO vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
WOO (Ethereum) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
WOO vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-06 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WOO | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0121 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $845.49K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $593.54K | $1.99B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 374 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~3,345× the liquidity of WOO
- CRD measures ~4,764× the 24h volume of WOO
What the data says
WOO
WOO is the token of WOO Network — the liquidity network and exchange stack (WOOFi, WOO X) that routes institutional-style execution to retail venues. The contract 0x4691937a7508860f876c9c0a2a617e7d9e945d4b is what our scan tracks: $594 thousand of pool liquidity as of September 6, 2026.
The honest shape: WOO is an exchange-ecosystem token, which means its value case tracks the volumes and staking economics of venues most retail holders will never open an account on — the thesis is B2B plumbing, not a consumer product. It has also been through a real cycle — a senior token that has lived through both the exchange-token mania and the hangover — so the pool here is liquid but the narrative is quieter than it was.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WOO or CRD?
By tracked market cap: WOO (Ethereum) measures — and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WOO or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: WOO (Ethereum) grades B and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WOO and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-06 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WOO at 0.00% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WOO vs RYYWOO vs FKBWOO vs RDKWOO vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-06→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.