HostWNUSDT0 vs LV — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs LV (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
WNUSDT0 vs LV — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| WNUSDT0 | LV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $0.05674 |
| Market cap | $651.27K | $5.73M |
| 24h volume | $520.44K DEX | $894.12 DEX |
| Liquidity | $708.82K | $202.45K |
| FDV | $712.88K | $5.71M |
| Holders | 40 | 3,863 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 275 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- LV measures ~8.8× the market cap of WNUSDT0
- WNUSDT0 measures ~3.5× the liquidity of LV
- WNUSDT0 measures ~582× the 24h volume of LV
- LV measures ~97× the holder count of WNUSDT0
- over the shared window WNUSDT0 moved +0.18% while LV moved −11.0%
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $709 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
LV
LV at 0x1001ff13bf368aa4fa85f21043648079f00e1001 is a Monad asset 275 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot, priced at a $5.7 million market cap across a 90.0 million supply.
The book is workable and the tape thin: $202.5 thousand of tracked depth on $894 of 24-hour volume — a pool that holds while almost nothing trades through it. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or LV?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures $651.27K and LV (Monad) measures $5.73M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or LV?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and LV (Monad) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and LV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.18% and LV at −11.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.