HostWNUSDT0 vs GMON — price, size and safety, side by side
WNUSDT0 (Monad) vs GMON (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-17.
WNUSDT0 vs GMON — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| WNUSDT0 | GMON | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.02 | $0.0251 |
| Market cap | $651.27K | $2.26M |
| 24h volume | $520.44K DEX | $279.61 DEX |
| Liquidity | $708.82K | $322.90K |
| FDV | $712.88K | $980.28K |
| Holders | 40 | 5,755 |
| Age (days) | 213 | 308 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- GMON measures ~3.5× the market cap of WNUSDT0
- WNUSDT0 measures ~2.2× the liquidity of GMON
- WNUSDT0 measures ~1,861× the 24h volume of GMON
- GMON measures ~144× the holder count of WNUSDT0
- over the shared window WNUSDT0 moved +0.18% while GMON moved −12.5%
What the data says
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $709 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
GMON
gMON at 0x8498312a6b3cbd158bf0c93abdcf29e6e4f55081 is a Monad liquid-staking receipt — the yield-bearing claim on staked MON — 293 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $2.3 million market cap sits above a $980.3 thousand fully-diluted figure on 38.3 million units.
The book is deep for the slice: $322.9 thousand of tracked depth against a $196 daily volume — receipts like this do their real mint-and-redeem through the staking contract, leaving the pool for marginal flow. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WNUSDT0 or GMON?
By tracked market cap: WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures $651.27K and GMON (Monad) measures $2.26M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WNUSDT0 or GMON?
On the contract checks we publish: WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B and GMON (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WNUSDT0 and GMON performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show WNUSDT0 at +0.18% and GMON at −12.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.