HostWLD vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
WLD (Ethereum) vs GRT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
WLD vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| WLD | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.5511 | $0.02869 |
| Market cap | $2.05B | $313.95M |
| 24h volume | $253.44K | $22.25K |
| Liquidity | $140.93K | $128.33K |
| FDV | $5.51B | $309.90M |
| Holders | 63,635 | 171,927 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WLD measures ~6.5× the market cap of GRT
- WLD measures ~11× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~2.7× the holder count of WLD
What the data says
WLD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on WLD to flag. Right now WLD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why WLD is at C (67/100) as of 2026-09-27, with real room to improve.
On the trading data, WLD shows thin liquidity of $140.93K and a holder base of 63,635 as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap near $2.05B, that $140.93K of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. A 63,635-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of WLD as of 2026-09-27, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
GRT
The most important thing to know about GRT is its authority setup. Right now GRT's contract keeps its mint function (2026-09-27 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. It's the main reason the read sits at 61/100 (grade C) today — and the clearest path to a higher grade is simply removing it.
By the numbers, GRT is showing thin liquidity of $128.33K and 171,927 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Set the $128.33K pool against roughly $313.95M in market cap and the picture sharpens — depth is shallow for the size, so trades move the price more than the chart suggests and getting out cleanly takes care. With 171,927 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created GRT holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WLD or GRT?
By tracked market cap: WLD (Ethereum) measures $2.05B and GRT (Ethereum) measures $313.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WLD or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: WLD (Ethereum) grades C and GRT (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WLD and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show WLD at 0.00% and GRT at 0.00%.
More comparisons
WLD vs BURNIE9QRI vs WLDWLD vs KETWLD vs AMDFRAX vs GRTGRT vs RFCGRT vs SCFGRT vs HABITAT
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.