HostWIF vs STONK — price, size and safety, side by side
WIF (Solana) vs STONK (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WIF vs STONK — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T00:15:22
| WIF | STONK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.2036 | $0.1127 |
| Market cap | $244.95M | $223.29M |
| 24h volume | $1.74M DEX | $57.74M DEX |
| Liquidity | $7.21M | $6.21M |
| FDV | $244.95M | $223.29M |
| Holders | 264,567 | 92,185 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- STONK measures ~33× the 24h volume of WIF
- WIF measures ~2.9× the holder count of STONK
- over the shared window WIF moved −6.80% while STONK moved −20.7%
What the data says
WIF
dogwifhat is a picture of a dog wearing a hat, and it is worth being precise about that, because $WIF's entire honest pitch is that there is no other pitch. No roadmap, no utility claims, no yield — just one of the strongest brands the 2023–24 memecoin cycle produced. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot, that brand is priced at roughly $245.0 million of market capitalization, spread across 264,567 holders at mint EKpQGSJtjMFqKZ9KQanSqYXRcF8fBopzLHYxdM65zcjm.
For a token with no team promises to audit, the on-chain mechanics are the whole due-diligence surface, and WIF's are clean: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, and the creator-associated wallet holding a share the snapshot rounds to zero. Nobody can print supply into your position, nobody can freeze your balance mid-exit, and no deployer sits on a stash waiting for your entry. Those are precisely the levers pulled in the launches our obituaries section documents, and their absence is what separates a volatile joke from a trap.
STONK
STONK is a Solana memecoin playing on the retail-trader "stonks" meme — the deliberate misspelling that became shorthand for market absurdity. The October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $223.3 million across 92,185 wallets on mint 6GmAFSYs4gk3FDao5FzzySQpPZaWsa4rUJHacpMpUNgx — one of the larger capitalizations on this page.
Size changes the questions. At this capitalization the token is a crowded trade by definition, and the tracked liquidity of about $6.2 million — while deep in absolute terms — is the number that decides whether large positions can enter or leave without paying the pool. For a token of this size, that ratio is healthy.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WIF or STONK?
By tracked market cap: WIF (Solana) measures $244.95M and STONK (Solana) measures $223.29M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WIF or STONK?
On the contract checks we publish: WIF (Solana) grades A and STONK (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WIF and STONK performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T00:15:22, the measured snapshots show WIF at −6.80% and STONK at −20.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T00:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.