WETH (Base) vs RDK (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
| WETH | RDK | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.40K | $2.07K |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $101.17M | $2.89B |
| Liquidity | $125.28M | $1.74B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,033 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
On Base, wrapped Ether isn't a token someone launched — it's part of the chain's factory equipment. The address gives it away: 0x4200000000000000000000000000000000000006 is a predeploy, one of the system contracts every OP-Stack network ships with at genesis, holding the same address on Base, Optimism, and their sibling chains. It wraps the network's native ETH into ERC-20 form one-for-one, redeemable instantly by anyone, with no owner, no admin keys, and no way to change it. HostDeFi's September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $125 million of tracked pool liquidity and $69 million of daily volume riding it — and as the settlement leg of most Base DEX pairs, its real footprint is larger than any sample.
The checklist result is the same as for its Ethereum-mainnet ancestor, for the same structural reasons: supply is mechanically pegged to deposited ETH (minted on wrap, burned on unwrap), there is no privileged party to misbehave, and the wrapper adds no exposure beyond ETH itself. Holding WETH on Base is holding ETH on Base — with one extra layer worth naming honestly: assets on Base inherit the rollup's own trust structure, including sequencer operation and upgrade governance under Coinbase and the Optimism ecosystem. That is a property of the chain, not this contract, but "as safe as the chain it's on" cuts both ways.
Sometimes the read on a token is defined by what is missing, and Rudake is that case. HostDeFi's August 19, 2026 capture of RDK — taken when the token was about one day old — has no holder count, no market capitalization, no mint- or freeze-control assessment, and no identifying history. What it does have is a pair of claims from the listing venue: roughly $1.74 billion in pool liquidity and $2.89 billion in daily volume. When the only two numbers present are the two easiest to fabricate, and every number that is hard to fabricate is absent, the shape of the data is itself the disclosure.
Why those two, specifically? Because screeners and aggregators rank by them. An operator who cycles trades against their own pool manufactures "volume" for the cost of gas; reserve figures arrive via feeds that don't audit what they relay. Holder counts and contract state, by contrast, live on-chain where anyone can check — which is why they are the fields that go missing when the goal is to look large rather than be large.
By tracked market cap: WETH (Base) measures — and RDK (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
On the contract checks we publish: WETH (Base) grades B and RDK (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
Between 2026-08-31 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WETH at −0.64% and RDK at 0.00%.
WETH vs RYYWETH vs FKBWETH vs CRDWETH vs CCVRDK vs RYYRDK vs FKBRDK vs CRDRDK vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-31→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.