HostWETH vs OHNO — price, size and safety, side by side
WETH (Ethereum) vs OHNO (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WETH vs OHNO — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WETH | OHNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $2.42K | $0.00007459 |
| Market cap | $5.41B | $778.43K |
| 24h volume | $462.86M DEX | $65.45 DEX |
| Liquidity | $902.53M | $164.73K |
| FDV | $5.39B | $778.43K |
| Holders | 3,680,746 | 22,296 |
| Age (days) | 1,727 | 925 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- WETH measures ~6,945× the market cap of OHNO
- WETH measures ~5,479× the liquidity of OHNO
- WETH measures ~7,072,450× the 24h volume of OHNO
- WETH measures ~165× the holder count of OHNO
What the data says
WETH
WETH is the oldest load-bearing contract in DeFi. Deployed in December 2017 as WETH9, the contract at 0xc02aaa39b223fe8d0a0e5c4f27ead9083c756cc2 does exactly one thing: wrap ETH — which predates the ERC-20 standard and doesn't conform to it — into a token that does, redeemable one-for-one, instantly, by anyone, forever. It has no owner, no admin functions, no upgrade path, and no pause switch. Nearly every DEX trade, lending market, and NFT sale on Ethereum has settled through it at some point; it is less a token than a piece of the chain's plumbing.
That architecture is why the usual checklist comes back almost empty. There is no team to rug, no supply policy to abuse — WETH supply is simply however much ETH is currently deposited in the contract, minted on wrap and burned on unwrap. The failure mode people theorize about (the contract holding less ETH than WETH outstanding) would require a bug that eight-plus years of the highest-value adversarial testing in crypto has not found. HostDeFi's October 9, 2026 snapshot shows roughly $903 million of tracked pool liquidity and $73 million of daily volume on this deployment, and both understate reality — WETH is one side of thousands of pools our sample doesn't enumerate.
OHNO
OHNO's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts OHNO at 92/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
Market-wise, OHNO carries deep liquidity of $164.73K, 22,296 wallets holding and an established record at 925 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $778.43K in market cap, the $164.73K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 22,296-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHNO as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WETH or OHNO?
By tracked market cap: WETH (Ethereum) measures $5.41B and OHNO (Blast) measures $778.43K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WETH or OHNO?
On the contract checks we publish: WETH (Ethereum) grades A and OHNO (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WETH and OHNO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WETH at −2.77% and OHNO at −4.17%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.