HostWET vs PYTH — price, size and safety, side by side
WET (Solana) vs PYTH (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WET vs PYTH — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-10-17T00:15:22
| WET | PYTH | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.05317 | $0.08658 |
| Market cap | $15.99M | $580.57M |
| 24h volume | $13.69K DEX | $1.98M DEX |
| Liquidity | $520.08K | $507.53K |
| FDV | $69.50M | $737.23M |
| Holders | 5,341 | 307,239 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- PYTH measures ~36× the market cap of WET
- PYTH measures ~145× the 24h volume of WET
- PYTH measures ~58× the holder count of WET
- over the shared window WET moved −17.1% while PYTH moved +61.5%
What the data says
WET
WET is the token of HumidiFi, one of Solana's proprietary AMMs — the "dark pool" market makers that quote through aggregators like Jupiter rather than running public liquidity pools. Mint WETZjtprkDMCcUxPi9PfWnowMRZkiGGHDb9rABuRZ2U; the October 6, 2026 snapshot puts tracked liquidity near $520 thousand, market cap near $16 million, and holders around 5,341.
HumidiFi matters in Solana's market structure: prop AMMs quietly became a large share of executed DEX volume because they quote tighter than public pools, and HumidiFi is one of the largest. That makes WET one of the more unusual tokens on this site — a claim tied to a trading firm whose revenue you cannot fully observe on-chain, since the whole point of a prop AMM is that its inventory and strategy are private.
PYTH
PYTH is infrastructure wearing a token. The Pyth Network supplies price feeds — the numbers that tell a lending protocol when to liquidate and a perps engine where to mark — to hundreds of applications across dozens of chains, sourced from exchanges and trading firms publishing their own data. The token governs that network. As of the October 6, 2026 snapshot it carries roughly $580.6 million of market capitalization across 307,239 holders at mint HZ1JovNiVvGrGNiiYvEozEVgZ58xaU3RKwX8eACQBCt3.
Token mechanics: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked. Nothing about the SPL structure can be used against a holder, which is the baseline this site grades first. The score on this page sits at 92 rather than a clean 100, and the honest reason is visible in one figure: tracked on-chain liquidity of only about $508 thousand in this snapshot — strikingly thin against a nine-figure market cap. PYTH's real depth lives on centralized exchanges; the Solana pools our read samples are a sliver. If your position size matters, that distinction decides where you should exit.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WET or PYTH?
By tracked market cap: WET (Solana) measures $15.99M and PYTH (Solana) measures $580.57M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WET or PYTH?
On the contract checks we publish: WET (Solana) grades A and PYTH (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WET and PYTH performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-10-17T00:15:22, the measured snapshots show WET at −17.1% and PYTH at +61.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-10-17T00:15:22; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.