HostWBTC vs WNUSDT0 — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs WNUSDT0 (Monad) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
WBTC vs WNUSDT0 — normalized performance, 2026-09-15 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| WBTC | WNUSDT0 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $1.02 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $651.27K |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $520.44K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $708.82K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $712.88K |
| Holders | 197,266 | 40 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 213 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~14,785× the market cap of WNUSDT0
- WBTC measures ~311× the liquidity of WNUSDT0
- WBTC measures ~357× the 24h volume of WNUSDT0
- WBTC measures ~4,932× the holder count of WNUSDT0
- over the shared window WBTC moved +7.49% while WNUSDT0 moved +0.51%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
WNUSDT0
WNUSDT0 is Neverland's wrapped USDT0 on Monad — the lending-market receipt for USDT0 supplied into Neverland's money market, one of the new chain's early DeFi venues. The deployment 0x4e8aaecce10ad9394e96fe5f2bd4e587a7b04298 is the receipt contract; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $709 thousand of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest framing mirrors its Aave sibling: a lending receipt is a claim on the market's solvency plus the asset inside — here USDT0, Tether's omnichain dollar over LayerZero — so the holder is three layers from the underlying dollars. Two lending markets clearing seven-figure receipts on a chain this young is the money-market layer actually bootstrapping.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or WNUSDT0?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and WNUSDT0 (Monad) measures $651.27K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or WNUSDT0?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and WNUSDT0 (Monad) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and WNUSDT0 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-15 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show WBTC at +7.49% and WNUSDT0 at +0.51%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-15→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.