HostWBTC vs STONE — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs STONE (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
WBTC vs STONE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WBTC | STONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $2.61K |
| Market cap | $9.63B | — |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $5.33 DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $29.86K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $1.76M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 50,903 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 904 |
| Safety grade | C | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~7,391× the liquidity of STONE
- WBTC measures ~34,926,855× the 24h volume of STONE
- WBTC measures ~3.9× the holder count of STONE
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
STONE
One thing stands out on STONE, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why STONE is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, STONE brings a $29.86K pool, 50,903 holders and an established record at 904 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $29.86K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 50,903 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created STONE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or STONE?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and STONE (Scroll) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or STONE?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and STONE (Scroll) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and STONE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −1.40% and STONE at +1.09%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.