HostWBTC vs SCR — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs SCR (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
WBTC vs SCR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WBTC | SCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.02162 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $4.95M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $2.62K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $11.39K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $26.03M |
| Holders | 197,266 | 132,947 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 717 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~1,947× the market cap of SCR
- WBTC measures ~19,368× the liquidity of SCR
- WBTC measures ~71,058× the 24h volume of SCR
- over the shared window WBTC moved −1.40% while SCR moved −17.0%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
SCR
One detail on SCR didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the market side, SCR brings $11.39K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 132,947 and an established 717-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $11.39K of depth against a market cap of about $4.95M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: SCR reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. With 132,947 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SCR holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or SCR?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and SCR (Scroll) measures $4.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or SCR?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and SCR (Scroll) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and SCR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −1.40% and SCR at −17.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.