HostWBTC vs OLAS — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs OLAS (Gnosis) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
WBTC vs OLAS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| WBTC | OLAS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.0518 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $13.31M |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $1.40K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $181.84K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $600.37K |
| Holders | 197,266 | 2,373 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 1,094 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~724× the market cap of OLAS
- WBTC measures ~1,214× the liquidity of OLAS
- WBTC measures ~132,387× the 24h volume of OLAS
- WBTC measures ~83× the holder count of OLAS
- over the shared window WBTC moved −2.13% while OLAS moved +16.6%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
OLAS
There's a small gap on this page — OLAS's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On liquidity and holders, OLAS shows a $181.84K pool, 2,373 holders and an established 1,094-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $13.31M, the $181.84K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. The 2,373-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OLAS holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or OLAS?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and OLAS (Gnosis) measures $13.31M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or OLAS?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and OLAS (Gnosis) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and OLAS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −2.13% and OLAS at +16.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.