HostWBTC vs EQUAL — price, size and safety, side by side
WBTC (Ethereum) vs EQUAL (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
WBTC vs EQUAL — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| WBTC | EQUAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $81.15K | $0.1668 |
| Market cap | $9.63B | $191.64K |
| 24h volume | $185.99M DEX | $1.49K DEX |
| Liquidity | $220.70M | $35.80K |
| FDV | $9.63B | $797.78K |
| Holders | 197,266 | 10,888 |
| Age (days) | 1,583 | 654 |
| Safety grade | C | B |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~50,246× the market cap of EQUAL
- WBTC measures ~6,165× the liquidity of EQUAL
- WBTC measures ~125,013× the 24h volume of EQUAL
- WBTC measures ~18× the holder count of EQUAL
- over the shared window WBTC moved −1.40% while EQUAL moved +22.0%
What the data says
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
EQUAL
One detail on EQUAL didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, EQUAL shows a $35.80K pool, a holder base of 10,888 and an established 654-day history as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $35.80K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $191.64K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. 10,888 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WBTC or EQUAL?
By tracked market cap: WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B and EQUAL (Sonic) measures $191.64K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WBTC or EQUAL?
On the contract checks we publish: WBTC (Ethereum) grades C and EQUAL (Sonic) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WBTC and EQUAL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show WBTC at −1.40% and EQUAL at +22.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.