HostWALTER vs ZBCN — price, size and safety, side by side
WALTER (Solana) vs ZBCN (Solana) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17.
WALTER vs ZBCN — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| WALTER | ZBCN | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0001621 | $0.00176 |
| Market cap | $151.60K | $170.71M |
| 24h volume | $10.12 | $286.46K |
| Liquidity | $40.59K | $40.41K |
| FDV | $151.60K | $170.71M |
| Holders | 3,847 | 109,795 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZBCN measures ~1,126× the market cap of WALTER
- ZBCN measures ~28,312× the 24h volume of WALTER
- ZBCN measures ~29× the holder count of WALTER
- over the shared window WALTER moved −12.1% while ZBCN moved −0.99%
What the data says
WALTER
walter — the Solana token of the "Walter" dog meme (the bull-terrier image macro that predates crypto) — at mint FV56CmR7fhEyPkymKfmviKV48uPo51ti9kAxssQqTDLu. The September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $41 thousand of liquidity and roughly 3,847 holders.
Classic-meme coins trade on the meme's cultural floor — Walter is a decade-old internet character, which gives the token a deeper brand base than most, and a ceiling set by the fact that the meme isn't going viral again; it just isn't going away either.
ZBCN
ZBCN is Zebec Network's token — the payments-streaming protocol's 2024 relaunch of its earlier ZBC asset — and it presents a specific tension in the September 16, 2026 snapshot: roughly $171 million of market capitalization carried by about $40 thousand of tracked on-chain liquidity, across 109,795 holders on mint ZBCNpuD7YMXzTHB2fhGkGi78MNsHGLRXUhRewNRm9RU.
Take the structure first, because it is unambiguous: mint authority revoked, freeze authority revoked, both confirmed. Nothing in the contract can dilute holders or freeze a sale. On the mechanics this format grades, ZBCN is clean, and the 85/100 reflects a single deduction.
FAQ
Which is bigger, WALTER or ZBCN?
By tracked market cap: WALTER (Solana) measures $151.60K and ZBCN (Solana) measures $170.71M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, WALTER or ZBCN?
On the contract checks we publish: WALTER (Solana) grades A and ZBCN (Solana) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have WALTER and ZBCN performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show WALTER at −12.1% and ZBCN at −0.99%.
More comparisons
WALTER vs RYYWALTER vs FKBWALTER vs CRDWALTER vs RDKZBCN vs RYYZBCN vs FKBZBCN vs CRDZBCN vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.