HostW vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
W (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
W vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| W | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.009985 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $56.98M | — |
| 24h volume | $56.98K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $114.65K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $88.19M | — |
| Holders | 97,295 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~17,315× the liquidity of W
- CRD measures ~70,689× the 24h volume of W
What the data says
W
W is the governance token of Wormhole, the cross-chain messaging protocol whose bridge carries a large share of Solana's wrapped-asset traffic — launched in an April 2024 multichain airdrop that ranks among the era's largest. The September 16, 2026 snapshot reads roughly $57.0 million of circulating market capitalization across 97,295 Solana holders on mint 85VBFQZC9TZkfaptBWjvUw7YbZjy52A6mjtPGjstQAmQ.
The supply picture has two layers. On-chain, both authorities are revoked and the creator-associated wallet holds under 0.01% — the SPL-level mechanics are fully clean. Above that sits the tokenomics layer: fully diluted value reads about $88.2 million against the $57.0 million circulating, so roughly a third of eventual supply is still locked and scheduled to arrive. Contract cleanliness and unlock pressure are different facts, and W carries the first without escaping the second.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, W or CRD?
By tracked market cap: W (Solana) measures $56.98M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, W or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: W (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have W and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show W at −2.84% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
W vs RYYW vs FKBW vs RDKW vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.