HostVVV vs OPENAI — price, size and safety, side by side
VVV (Base) vs OPENAI (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-02.
VVV vs OPENAI — normalized performance, 2026-09-26 to 2026-10-02
| VVV | OPENAI | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $24.45 | $0.0000009391 |
| Market cap | $1.06B | $2.55M |
| 24h volume | $4.78M DEX | $24.07M DEX |
| Liquidity | $18.88M | $9.03M |
| FDV | $1.78B | $2.55M |
| Holders | 156,807 | 5,065 |
| Age (days) | 176 | 0 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- VVV measures ~416× the market cap of OPENAI
- VVV measures ~2.1× the liquidity of OPENAI
- OPENAI measures ~5.0× the 24h volume of VVV
- VVV measures ~31× the holder count of OPENAI
- over the shared window VVV moved −4.88% while OPENAI moved −98.1%
What the data says
VVV
VVV is Venice.ai's token — Erik Voorhees' uncensored-AI platform, where staking VVV buys a share of the platform's inference capacity rather than a pure governance claim. The contract 0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf is the Base deployment our scan tracks, at $18.9 million of pool liquidity as of October 9, 2026.
The honest read: VVV is unusual among AI tokens for having a concrete utility loop — stake, get API quota — so its demand partly tracks actual inference usage rather than pure narrative. The counterweights are the usual: a single-platform dependency, and the fact that "uncensored" positioning is both the moat and the regulatory question. A utility token on a real product is still a utility token.
OPENAI
OPENAI starts from a genuinely strong place at the contract level. The contract cannot mint new supply, so the float can't be diluted, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. With the contract side handled, everything left to think about is ordinary market risk (90/100, 2026-10-09).
On the trading data, OPENAI shows deep liquidity of $9.03M, 5,065 wallets holding and a brand-new 0-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $2.55M in market cap, the $9.03M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. The 5,065-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. Reassuringly, the wallet that created OPENAI holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VVV or OPENAI?
By tracked market cap: VVV (Base) measures $1.06B and OPENAI (Base) measures $2.55M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VVV or OPENAI?
On the contract checks we publish: VVV (Base) grades B and OPENAI (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VVV and OPENAI performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-26 and 2026-10-02, the measured snapshots show VVV at −4.88% and OPENAI at −98.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-26→2026-10-02; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.