HostVVS vs WBTC — price, size and safety, side by side
VVS (Cronos) vs WBTC (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
VVS vs WBTC — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| VVS | WBTC | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.0000009394 | $81.15K |
| Market cap | $43.09M | $9.63B |
| 24h volume | $29.65K DEX | $185.99M DEX |
| Liquidity | $17.11M | $220.70M |
| FDV | $94.10M | $9.63B |
| Holders | 126,843 | 197,266 |
| Age (days) | 1,792 | 1,583 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- WBTC measures ~223× the market cap of VVS
- WBTC measures ~13× the liquidity of VVS
- WBTC measures ~6,272× the 24h volume of VVS
- WBTC measures ~1.6× the holder count of VVS
What the data says
VVS
The headline on VVS is a permission the team still holds. The mint function on VVS's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, leaving the deployer able to create new supply for now. That's what's holding the score at 75/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Market-wise, VVS carries deep liquidity of $17.11M, 126,843 wallets holding and 1,792 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $17.11M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $43.09M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A holder base of 126,843 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of VVS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
WBTC
WBTC is the original wrapped Bitcoin — the ERC-20 that put BTC on Ethereum's DeFi rails in 2019, custodied by BitGo with a mint-and-burn pipeline run through KYC'd merchants. The deployment 0x2260fac5e5542a773aa44fbcfedf7c193bc2c599 is the canonical mint, one of the oldest contract addresses in DeFi; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $220.7 million of tracked pool liquidity on this pair set — a slice of a float that spans every major venue.
The honest frame is unchanged since launch: holding WBTC means trusting BitGo's custody — the reserve is attested and the mint pipeline is transparent, but the claim is institutional, not cryptographic. Coinbase's cbBTC arrived as the regulated-competitor answer; the two trade the same BTC exposure with different custodians, and the depth split between them is the market's live verdict on whose custody it prefers.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VVS or WBTC?
By tracked market cap: VVS (Cronos) measures $43.09M and WBTC (Ethereum) measures $9.63B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VVS or WBTC?
On the contract checks we publish: VVS (Cronos) grades B and WBTC (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VVS and WBTC performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show VVS at −5.05% and WBTC at −2.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.