HostVIRTUAL vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
VIRTUAL (Solana) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
VIRTUAL vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| VIRTUAL | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.6696 | $0.01763 |
| Market cap | $22.88M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | $399.67K DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $2.19M | $301.30K |
| FDV | $22.88M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 28,376 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | — | 140 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- VIRTUAL measures ~2.0× the market cap of PLAY
- VIRTUAL measures ~7.3× the liquidity of PLAY
- PLAY measures ~2.7× the 24h volume of VIRTUAL
- VIRTUAL measures ~4.4× the holder count of PLAY
- over the shared window VIRTUAL moved −3.47% while PLAY moved −43.5%
What the data says
VIRTUAL
VIRTUAL is Virtuals Protocol's token — the asset behind one of crypto-AI's more durable experiments: a platform where AI agents launch as tradable tokens and their activity routes value back to the protocol's token. The mint 3iQL8BFS2vE7mww4ehAqQHAsbmRNCrPxizWAT2Zfyr9y is the Solana deployment; our October 6, 2026 snapshot reads $2.2 million of tracked pool liquidity and grades it A.
The honest shape: Virtuals is a platform bet in the crypto-AI cohort — its token's value depends on agents it hosts actually generating sustained activity rather than launch-day volume spikes, which is the failure mode most agent-token platforms hit. The A grade covers the Solana mint; the platform's usage is an off-chain measurement.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VIRTUAL or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: VIRTUAL (Solana) measures $22.88M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VIRTUAL or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: VIRTUAL (Solana) grades A and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VIRTUAL and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show VIRTUAL at −3.47% and PLAY at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.