HostVIBE vs QNT — price, size and safety, side by side
VIBE (Ethereum) vs QNT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-16 / 2026-10-16.
VIBE vs QNT — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| VIBE | QNT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $6.35 | $200.93 |
| Market cap | — | $3.82B |
| 24h volume | $2.11M DEX | $1.78M DEX |
| Liquidity | $1.32M | $1.17M |
| FDV | $28.50M | $11.93B |
| Holders | 4,223 | 183,572 |
| Age (days) | 72 | 600 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- QNT measures ~43× the holder count of VIBE
- over the shared window VIBE moved −44.5% while QNT moved −23.6%
What the data says
VIBE
VIBE — Vibe Coins at 0xd34a99bc0f67ae1bbd63c660e6d0b0dd03e263b7 — is 54 days into an Ethereum book priced at a $28.5 million cap at the October 9, 2026 snapshot.
The pool is the strongest measured fact: $1.3 million of tracked liquidity is workable against that cap for ordinary size, and roughly $1.1 million of daily volume shows the book actually trades. The unknown sits one layer down — contract-level controls were not assessed, so mint, pause and upgrade levers are unverified rather than cleared, and holder distribution was not measured in this pass.
QNT
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on QNT. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why QNT is at B (75/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Looking at the market data, QNT shows a $1.17M pool, 183,572 holders and an established record at 600 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap near $3.82B, that $1.17M of liquidity is the real constraint here: a pool this shallow relative to the cap makes slippage, not the contract, the thing to plan around. With 183,572 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, VIBE or QNT?
By tracked market cap: VIBE (Ethereum) measures — and QNT (Ethereum) measures $3.82B — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, VIBE or QNT?
On the contract checks we publish: VIBE (Ethereum) grades A and QNT (Ethereum) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have VIBE and QNT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show VIBE at −44.5% and QNT at −23.6%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.