HostUXD vs CCV — price, size and safety, side by side
UXD (Solana) vs CCV (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
UXD vs CCV — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| UXD | CCV | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.00 | $2.01K |
| Market cap | $297.91K | — |
| 24h volume | $1.37K | $2.74B |
| Liquidity | $47.02K | $1.69B |
| FDV | $297.91K | — |
| Holders | 7,123 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CCV measures ~36,032× the liquidity of UXD
- CCV measures ~1,996,404× the 24h volume of UXD
What the data says
UXD
UXD — UXD Protocol's dollar token — was Solana's early delta-neutral stablecoin experiment: SOL collateral paired with a short perp, targeting a $1 price without a bank account. Mint 7kbnvuGBxxj8AG9qp8Scn56muWGaRaFqxg1FsRp3PaFT; the September 16, 2026 snapshot shows about $47 thousand of liquidity and roughly 7,123 holders.
The honest history is the whole story here: UXD's model was the ancestor of what Ethena later scaled — and UXD itself lost its peg in 2022-23 when funding rates ran persistently negative against it, and never recovered institutional confidence. It survives as a small-cap instrument with a live community, but a dollar token whose peg broke and stayed broken is a different object than a dollar.
CCV
Cucuvo belongs to a genre, and the genre is the story. Base's low fees make it one of the cheapest places in crypto to launch a token, and each week produces a wave of day-old tickers whose listing-feed numbers are tuned to catch screener sorts. CCV entered HostDeFi's records on August 19, 2026 — roughly one day after it began existing — carrying the wave's characteristic costume: about $1.69 billion in claimed liquidity and $2.74 billion in claimed daily volume, wrapped around a recorded market cap of zero and no holder count at all. Real markets earn numbers like those over years and show millions of holders doing it; this profile shows the numbers and nothing that would produce them.
The claimed figures come from venue feeds, and venue feeds report what pools tell them — including pools whose "volume" is an operator trading with themselves and whose "reserves" are valued against a price the same operator sets. Our capture graded the market shape those feeds described, which is why the grade on this page should be read as a grade of the costume, not the token. The contract at 0xedb2bbe57fe65de82039bed17d47d22c083e5609 — its mint powers, owner functions, and whether a buyer can actually sell — was not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, UXD or CCV?
By tracked market cap: UXD (Solana) measures $297.91K and CCV (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, UXD or CCV?
On the contract checks we publish: UXD (Solana) grades A and CCV (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have UXD and CCV performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show UXD at −0.04% and CCV at 0.00%.
More comparisons
UXD vs RYYUXD vs FKBUXD vs CRDUXD vs RDKCCV vs RYYCCV vs FKBCCV vs CRDCCV vs RDK
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.