HostUSDUC vs CRD — price, size and safety, side by side
USDUC (Solana) vs CRD (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USDUC vs CRD — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USDUC | CRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.002913 | $2.13K |
| Market cap | $2.90M | — |
| 24h volume | $167.28K | $4.03B |
| Liquidity | $234.65K | $1.99B |
| FDV | $2.90M | — |
| Holders | 14,856 | — |
| Age (days) | — | 1 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- CRD measures ~8,460× the liquidity of USDUC
- CRD measures ~24,079× the 24h volume of USDUC
- over the shared window USDUC moved −15.3% while CRD moved 0.00%
What the data says
USDUC
USDUC — "unstable coin" — is a Solana meme whose brand is anti-stablecoin honesty: the name tells you the price is not a dollar and not supposed to be. The mint CB9dDufT3ZuQXqqSfa1c5kY935TEreyBw9XJXxHKpump is what our scan tracks: $2.9 million market cap, $235 thousand of liquidity and 14,856 holders as of September 16, 2026.
The joke deserves credit for truth-in-advertising in a corpus full of fake pegs — USDUC trades at three-tenths of a cent and never claimed otherwise. Behind the gag it is a standard meme: real pool, wide holder base, nothing underneath. The only way a coin named "unstable" can lie is by being stable.
CRD
Four billion dollars is what CRD's venue feed claimed the token traded in a single day — on August 19, 2026, when Cirudu was approximately one day old. Put that figure next to the rest of the same snapshot: about $1.99 billion in claimed liquidity, a recorded market capitalization of zero, and no holder count at all. For scale, four billion dollars of daily turnover is what entire major exchanges do; a nameless day-old Base token reporting it while having no measurable owners is describing something that cannot exist. The parsimonious explanation is reported-figure inflation — trading volume manufactured against the token's own pools so that listing feeds repeat impressive numbers.
This page's honest scope: HostDeFi's EVM snapshot grades market structure from those very venue feeds, which is why the incoherence above is the most valuable output the capture produced. The contract itself — mint powers, owner functions, transfer taxes, honeypot mechanics at 0x95735d3f68d045c942afb9ea1090f6b03150bfab — was not assessed in this snapshot, and with a token in this category, the contract is where the actual answer lives. Run the live scan above; it reads the chain, not the feed.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDUC or CRD?
By tracked market cap: USDUC (Solana) measures $2.90M and CRD (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDUC or CRD?
On the contract checks we publish: USDUC (Solana) grades A and CRD (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDUC and CRD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USDUC at −15.3% and CRD at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDUC vs RYYUSDUC vs FKBUSDUC vs RDKUSDUC vs CCVCRD vs RYYCRD vs FKBCRD vs RDKCRD vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.