HostUSDT vs STONE — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs STONE (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
USDT vs STONE — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| USDT | STONE | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $2.61K |
| Market cap | $9.19B | — |
| 24h volume | $1.12B DEX | $5.33 DEX |
| Liquidity | $548.60M | $29.86K |
| FDV | $9.19B | $1.76M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 50,903 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 904 |
| Safety grade | B | C |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~18,372× the liquidity of STONE
- USDT measures ~209,894,877× the 24h volume of STONE
- USDT measures ~1,584× the holder count of STONE
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
STONE
One thing stands out on STONE, and it's worth knowing up front. As of the 2026-10-09 read, the contract's mint function hasn't been removed, which means the team can still create new supply. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why STONE is at C (60/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
On the market side, STONE brings a $29.86K pool, 50,903 holders and an established record at 904 days as of 2026-10-09. Read $29.86K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. 50,903 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. Reassuringly, the wallet that created STONE holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or STONE?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B and STONE (Scroll) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or STONE?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and STONE (Scroll) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and STONE performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show USDT at −0.11% and STONE at +1.09%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.