HostUSDT vs SCUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs SCUSD (Sonic) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
USDT vs SCUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| USDT | SCUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $0.9943 |
| Market cap | $9.19B | $1.92M |
| 24h volume | $1.12B DEX | $5.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $548.60M | $93.38K |
| FDV | $9.19B | $643.69K |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 9,491 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 626 |
| Safety grade | B | E |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~4,788× the market cap of SCUSD
- USDT measures ~5,875× the liquidity of SCUSD
- USDT measures ~208,812× the 24h volume of SCUSD
- USDT measures ~8,495× the holder count of SCUSD
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
SCUSD
Before the market numbers, there's a contract detail on SCUSD to flag. Right now SCUSD's contract keeps its mint function (2026-10-09 snapshot), so whoever holds it can create new supply at any point. That's what's holding the score at 39/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Here's where SCUSD stands today: a $93.38K pool, 9,491 wallets holding and 626 days old as of 2026-10-09. The $93.38K pool against a ~$1.92M cap is a middling ratio — enough for typical trades to clear, but worth respecting if you're trading size. 9,491 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SCUSD as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or SCUSD?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B and SCUSD (Sonic) measures $1.92M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or SCUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and SCUSD (Sonic) grades E. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and SCUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show USDT at −0.11% and SCUSD at −0.64%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.