HostUSDT vs SCR — price, size and safety, side by side
USDT (BNB Chain) vs SCR (Scroll) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
USDT vs SCR — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| USDT | SCR | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9991 | $0.02162 |
| Market cap | $9.19B | $4.95M |
| 24h volume | $1.12B DEX | $2.62K DEX |
| Liquidity | $548.60M | $11.39K |
| FDV | $9.19B | $26.03M |
| Holders | 80,624,971 | 132,947 |
| Age (days) | 311 | 717 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- USDT measures ~1,857× the market cap of SCR
- USDT measures ~48,144× the liquidity of SCR
- USDT measures ~427,030× the 24h volume of SCR
- USDT measures ~606× the holder count of SCR
- over the shared window USDT moved −0.11% while SCR moved −17.0%
What the data says
USDT
USDT on BSC is Tether's dollar on the chain that still clears a meaningful share of stablecoin volume — issued by Binance's peg mechanism under the BEP-20 standard at 0x55d398326f99059ff775485246999027b3197955, the canonical BSC mint. Our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $548.6 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest chain note: this is a pegged representation — the reserve sits with Tether, and the BSC contract is Binance's wrapped issuance of that claim, not a second Tether mint. That makes its risk profile two-layered: Tether's attestation cadence underneath, plus the bridge-custody layer Binance operates on top. For most users the distinction never matters; for anyone holding size it is the entire question.
SCR
One detail on SCR didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
On the market side, SCR brings $11.39K of on-chain liquidity, a holder base of 132,947 and an established 717-day history as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $11.39K of depth against a market cap of about $4.95M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: SCR reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. With 132,947 holders, ownership is spread wide — the opposite of the handful-of-wallets setup that lets one seller steer the price. Reassuringly, the wallet that created SCR holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDT or SCR?
By tracked market cap: USDT (BNB Chain) measures $9.19B and SCR (Scroll) measures $4.95M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDT or SCR?
On the contract checks we publish: USDT (BNB Chain) grades B and SCR (Scroll) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDT and SCR performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show USDT at −0.11% and SCR at −17.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.