HostUSDM vs FKB — price, size and safety, side by side
USDM (Ethereum) vs FKB (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USDM vs FKB — normalized performance, 2026-08-24 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USDM | FKB | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9968 | $1.05 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $7.97M | $2.45B |
| Liquidity | $20.11M | $2.19B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 1,021 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- FKB measures ~109× the liquidity of USDM
- FKB measures ~307× the 24h volume of USDM
What the data says
USDM
USDM is Mountain Protocol's yield-bearing dollar — a regulated, rebasing stablecoin that pays T-bill yield to holders by growing their balance rather than requiring a stake contract. The deployment 0xbbaec992fc2d637151daf40451f160bf85f3c8c1 is the Ethereum mint; our August 24, 2026 snapshot reads $20 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: rebasing means balance and "value" move together — a wallet holding USDM sees the unit count tick up daily as yield accrues, which is elegant until accounting or a DeFi pool assumes a static balance. Regulated in Bermuda, permissioned to hold — both the feature set and the limitation come from the same compliance posture.
FKB
Fukabu was one day old when HostDeFi's snapshot caught it on August 19, 2026, and age is the right place to start, because every other number on this page should be read through it. In its first day of existence, FKB's venue feed claimed roughly $2.19 billion of pool liquidity and $2.45 billion of daily volume — depth that would rank it among the largest markets in crypto — alongside a recorded market capitalization of zero and no holder count whatsoever. Genuine markets do not look like this at any age; brand-new ones only look like this when the reporting venue's figures are being inflated, usually by wash trading against self-provided reserves.
What our read did and didn't do here matters. On EVM chains, HostDeFi's snapshot grades market structure from venue data; it does not open the contract. So nothing on this page speaks to whether FKB at 0xe549920f83178586c8536400862f5349c0d2d883 can mint supply, tax transfers, block sells, or be drained by an owner key — the standard failure modes of fresh Base-chain tokens. The B grade reflects only the market inputs the capture carried, and those inputs are precisely what this essay is telling you not to trust.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDM or FKB?
By tracked market cap: USDM (Ethereum) measures — and FKB (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDM or FKB?
On the contract checks we publish: USDM (Ethereum) grades B and FKB (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDM and FKB performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-08-24 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USDM at 0.00% and FKB at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDM vs RYYUSDM vs CRDUSDM vs RDKUSDM vs CCVFKB vs RYYFKB vs CRDFKB vs RDKFKB vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-08-24→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.