HostUSDC.E vs IBERA — price, size and safety, side by side
USDC.E (Gnosis) vs IBERA (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
USDC.E vs IBERA — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| USDC.E | IBERA | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9979 | $0.1959 |
| Market cap | $9.84M | $17.52M |
| 24h volume | $154.06K DEX | $3.02K DEX |
| Liquidity | $3.18M | $42.63K |
| FDV | $9.86M | $17.52M |
| Holders | 7,909 | 35,930 |
| Age (days) | 521 | 607 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- IBERA measures ~1.8× the market cap of USDC.E
- USDC.E measures ~75× the liquidity of IBERA
- USDC.E measures ~51× the 24h volume of IBERA
- IBERA measures ~4.5× the holder count of USDC.E
- over the shared window USDC.E moved −0.22% while IBERA moved −11.4%
What the data says
USDC.E
One detail on USDC.E didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, USDC.E carries $3.18M of on-chain liquidity, 7,909 wallets holding and an established record at 521 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $9.84M in market cap, the $3.18M of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 7,909-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of USDC.E as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
IBERA
There's a small gap on this page — IBERA's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and a quick live scan will confirm the current state for you.
Looking at the market data, IBERA shows a $42.63K pool, a holder base of 35,930 and an established record at 607 days as of 2026-10-09. The number worth sitting with is that $42.63K of depth against a market cap of about $17.52M — a thin pool for a token this size, which means a position that feels small to you can still be large for the pool: IBERA reprices on relatively little flow, and a sizable exit will slip. 35,930 holders is a decent base; just remember the number alone doesn't reveal how much the top wallets control, so weigh it with the concentration figure. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of IBERA as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDC.E or IBERA?
By tracked market cap: USDC.E (Gnosis) measures $9.84M and IBERA (Berachain) measures $17.52M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDC.E or IBERA?
On the contract checks we publish: USDC.E (Gnosis) grades B and IBERA (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDC.E and IBERA performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show USDC.E at −0.22% and IBERA at −11.4%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.