HostUSDAT vs COMP — price, size and safety, side by side
USDAT (Ethereum) vs COMP (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-27 / 2026-09-27.
USDAT vs COMP — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-09-27T21:19:38
| USDAT | COMP | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9994 | $24.39 |
| Market cap | $82.51M | $243.89M |
| 24h volume | $701.69K | $110.94K |
| Liquidity | $4.70M | $4.40M |
| FDV | $82.56M | $243.89M |
| Holders | 1,639 | 220,085 |
| Age (days) | 169 | — |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- COMP measures ~3.0× the market cap of USDAT
- USDAT measures ~6.3× the 24h volume of COMP
- COMP measures ~134× the holder count of USDAT
What the data says
USDAT
USDat is Ethena and Anchorage's GENIUS-compliant dollar — the stablecoin built specifically to fit the US stablecoin law's rails, issued through a federally-chartered crypto bank rather than a foreign issuer. The deployment 0x23238f20b894f29041f48d88ee91131c395aaa71 is the Ethereum mint; our September 27, 2026 snapshot reads $4.7 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest note: GENIUS-compliant is a regulatory shape, not a risk verdict — it means the reserve structure (T-bills, qualified custodian, redemption terms) is defined by the same law that governs every US-compliant stable, which makes USDAT's backing more legible than most but no more guaranteed. What it buys Ethena is a US-legal distribution path for the stable stack that made USDe; what it buys a holder is boring, verifiable reserves.
COMP
On the two things that matter most in a token contract, COMP looks great. Nobody can print fresh supply, which keeps every holder's share intact, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. Neither lever existing is the main reason COMP's 100/100 comes down to market factors, not contract ones (2026-09-27).
Here's where COMP stands today: workable liquidity of $4.40M and 220,085 wallets holding as of 2026-09-27. Against a market cap of about $243.89M, the $4.40M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A holder base of 220,085 is reassuring too — counts like that are difficult to fake and point to real, spread-out ownership rather than a few concentrated hands. Reassuringly, the wallet that created COMP holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-09-27 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USDAT or COMP?
By tracked market cap: USDAT (Ethereum) measures $82.51M and COMP (Ethereum) measures $243.89M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USDAT or COMP?
On the contract checks we publish: USDAT (Ethereum) grades B and COMP (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USDAT and COMP performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-09-27T21:19:38, the measured snapshots show USDAT at 0.00% and COMP at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USDAT vs DRVB13B vs USDATUSDAT vs ELEVATEUSDAT vs ANTFUNCOMP vs CBBTCCOMP vs BSBBP vs COMPTRX vs COMP
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-09-27T21:19:38; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.