Open app

USD0++ vs XVS — price, size and safety, side by side

USD0++ (Ethereum) vs XVS (BNB Chain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.

USD0++B

$0.9747
USD0 Liquid Bond on Ethereum
Trade USD0++
vs

XVSA

$2.99
Venus on BNB Chain
Trade XVS

USD0++ vs XVS — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32

100 — shared start
USD0++ +0.51%  ·  XVS −13.6% — both series rebased to 100 at the first measured point in the shared window; not a raw-price chart.
USD0++XVS
Price$0.9747$2.99
Market cap—$51.77M
24h volume$4.15 DEX$156.92K DEX
Liquidity$5.33M$563.93K
FDV$504.34M$91.30M
Holders2,71378,519
Age (days)528318
Safety gradeBA

Where they differ

What the data says

USD0++

USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.

The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.

XVS

XVS — Venus Protocol's governance token at 0xcf6bb5389c92bdda8a3747ddb454cb7a64626c63 — governs BNB Chain's largest legacy money market, the Compound-style lending venue that has run on the chain since 2020. XVS holders vote the parameters of a lending book measured in billions — a real franchise, with a real caveat in its history.

The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $51.8 million market cap against an $91.3 million FDV — 56% of the 30-million supply circulating — with $563.9 thousand of tracked depth and 78,519 holders.

FAQ

Which is bigger, USD0++ or XVS?

By tracked market cap: USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — and XVS (BNB Chain) measures $51.77M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.

Which is safer, USD0++ or XVS?

On the contract checks we publish: USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B and XVS (BNB Chain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.

How have USD0++ and XVS performed over the shared window?

Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show USD0++ at +0.51% and XVS at −13.6%.

The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.

Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.