HostUSD0++ vs SHFL — price, size and safety, side by side
USD0++ (Ethereum) vs SHFL (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
USD0++ vs SHFL — normalized performance, 2026-10-06 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| USD0++ | SHFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9747 | $0.5091 |
| Market cap | — | $204.06M |
| 24h volume | $4.15 DEX | $890.51K DEX |
| Liquidity | $5.33M | $4.45M |
| FDV | $504.34M | $384.60M |
| Holders | 2,713 | 8,010 |
| Age (days) | 528 | 937 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- SHFL measures ~214,568× the 24h volume of USD0++
- SHFL measures ~3.0× the holder count of USD0++
- over the shared window USD0++ moved +0.21% while SHFL moved +21.7%
What the data says
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our October 9, 2026 snapshot reads $5.3 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
SHFL
SHFL passes the check that trips up most risky tokens — its contract controls. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. It's a reassuring starting point: 100/100 as of 2026-10-09, with the structural risks already off the table.
On liquidity and holders, SHFL shows $4.45M of on-chain liquidity, 8,010 holders and an established 937-day history as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $204.06M, the $4.45M pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 8,010-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of SHFL as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD0++ or SHFL?
By tracked market cap: USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — and SHFL (Ethereum) measures $204.06M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD0++ or SHFL?
On the contract checks we publish: USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B and SHFL (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD0++ and SHFL performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-06 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show USD0++ at +0.21% and SHFL at +21.7%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-06→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.