HostUSD0++ vs RYY — price, size and safety, side by side
USD0++ (Ethereum) vs RYY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-09-17T20:24:07 / 2026-09-17T20:24:07.
USD0++ vs RYY — normalized performance, 2026-09-08 to 2026-09-17T20:24:07
| USD0++ | RYY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.9806 | $1.08 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $1.45M | $3.48B |
| Liquidity | $3.42M | $2.26B |
| FDV | — | — |
| Holders | — | — |
| Age (days) | 528 | 1 |
| Safety grade | B | B |
Where they differ
- RYY measures ~660× the liquidity of USD0++
- RYY measures ~2,390× the 24h volume of USD0++
What the data says
USD0++
USD0++ is Usual Protocol's bonded T-bill — the yield-bearing form of its USD0 stablecoin, structured as a liquid bond that locks the underlying for a term and pays boosted yield for the commitment. The deployment 0x35d8949372d46b7a3d5a56006ae77b215fc69bc0 is the mint; our September 14, 2026 snapshot reads $3.4 million of tracked pool liquidity.
The honest mechanics: the "++" is duration — USD0++ trades instant redeemability for a locked term in exchange for protocol yield, which means it can and does trade below the dollar value of the USD0 inside it when the market marks that lock-up at a discount. A holder isn't buying a stablecoin; they're buying a bond with a market price.
RYY
The most useful thing this page can tell you about Reyayu is that its numbers do not add up, and that you should treat that as the finding rather than a gap in it. When HostDeFi captured RYY on August 19, 2026, the token was roughly one day old — and the venue data attached to it claimed about $2.26 billion in pool liquidity and $3.48 billion in daily volume, while reporting no market capitalization and no holder count at all. A day-old token with more claimed depth than most top-fifty assets, and nothing else on the books, is not a growth story. It is the signature of inflated venue-reported figures: self-dealt volume and reserve numbers a listing API repeats without judging.
Be equally clear about what this page has not checked. Our Base-chain read covers market structure only — it has not assessed this contract's mint controls, owner privileges, transfer taxes, or sell-side behavior, which is exactly where fresh EVM tokens hide their traps. The B grade shown here scores the market-shape inputs the snapshot carried; it is not a contract audit, and on a token like this the contract is the entire question.
FAQ
Which is bigger, USD0++ or RYY?
By tracked market cap: USD0++ (Ethereum) measures — and RYY (Base) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, USD0++ or RYY?
On the contract checks we publish: USD0++ (Ethereum) grades B and RYY (Base) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have USD0++ and RYY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-08 and 2026-09-17T20:24:07, the measured snapshots show USD0++ at +0.93% and RYY at 0.00%.
More comparisons
USD0++ vs FKBUSD0++ vs CRDUSD0++ vs RDKUSD0++ vs CCVRYY vs FKBRYY vs CRDRYY vs RDKRYY vs CCV
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-08→2026-09-17T20:24:07; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.